A 2026 wellness market report from eMarketer says people now trust AI tools and influencers over their own doctors on diet, supplements and longevity, borrowing the figure from a March 2026 Edelman survey nobody can actually locate. This includes practices like yours.
Practices that assumed a framed certificate on the wall settled the trust question might want to sit down for this one.
| Original Research | eMarketer's 2026 wellness market write-up claims consumers rank AI tools and influencers above physicians for diet, supplement and longevity choices. |
|---|---|
| Source | https://www.emarketer.com/content/health-wellness-market-2026 |
| Overview | eMarketer's health and wellness market report for 2026 references a supposed Edelman survey to argue that trust in health decisions has drifted from doctors to digital and social sources, though eMarketer publishes the claim without a working link to it. |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publisher | Media, eMarketer (citing an unnamed Edelman survey) |
| Relevance to Wellbeing | High |
| Our Verdict | Too early to tell the stat gets repeated as fact but nobody involved will show you the survey it supposedly came from. |
| Our Summary |
|
| Our Geo View | Applies broadly to all countries. |
eMarketer's 2026 wellness market rundown mentions, in passing, that a March 2026 Edelman survey found consumers trust AI and influencers more than doctors on health choices.
eMarketer, health and wellness market report, 2026. The Edelman survey itself is not linked, precisely dated, or otherwise identifiable, so it is being treated here as secondary and unverified.
Credibility flags: no methodology disclosed, no sample size given, and the primary source (presumably Edelman) is not directly named or linked anywhere on the page.
A relevance score out of 100, built from three things: how well it fits the six practice types, how recent it is, and how solid the methodology behind it is.
Marked down heavily on how solid the method is, since there's no attribution at all, though it lands in the middle on practice fit because the subject matter touches the wider sector, and it scores well on recency simply for being dated 2026.
| Practice type | Relevance | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|
| Coaching | Medium | Mention your training and credentials somewhere clients will actually see them. |
| Therapy | Medium | Address online health claims directly in early sessions rather than ignoring them. |
| Training | High | Post real advice regularly, since fitness is prime influencer territory. |
| Alternative Healing | High | Be visible on your own terms before someone less qualified fills the gap. |
| Clinical | Medium | Reinforce credentials clearly in patient-facing materials. |
| Retreat/Centre | Low | Keep an eye on this one, no urgent action needed. |
Best before: revisit this once Edelman's actual 2026 trust survey surfaces, or whenever eMarketer publishes the same claim with a working link attached.
Most practices already suspect a phone gets consulted before they do, and this is just somebody trying to put a number on it.
You stayed to the end and here we both are. We have a visual river, a story garden and a listening wind that belong to a practice exactly like yours - and a discovery call where they all make beautiful sense over coffee. Biscuit?