GWI's Health & Wellbeing report promises marketers a look at how people's interest in fitness, food and general health shapes what they buy, though the page itself won't say what year any of this is from; this includes practices like yours, assuming you can find the numbers underneath the promise.
Practices tempted to borrow GWI's confidence about health-conscious consumers will find plenty of confidence and very little evidence sitting under it.
| Original Research | A GWI landing page describing a report on how brands can make use of people's interest in health, fitness and wellbeing. |
|---|---|
| Source | https://www.gwi.com/reports/health-and-wellbeing |
| Overview | The page pitches a broad consumer-trends report on health attitudes, exercise habits and buying preferences, published by GlobalWebIndex, a commercial market-research firm. |
| Year | Not stated anywhere on the source page. |
| Publisher | Brand, GlobalWebIndex (GWI) |
| Relevance to Wellbeing | Directionally relevant to any practice selling wellbeing services, but the page offers a sales pitch rather than a citable figure. |
| Our Verdict | Too early to tell worth a read for general context, not worth repeating to a client as a fact. |
| Our Summary |
|
| Our Geo View | Applies broadly to all countries |
GWI's own summary says the report helps marketers make use of people's interest in healthy living, exercise and looking after themselves.
GlobalWebIndex (GWI), publish date not given; the full report sits behind a download or registration wall, so this is a description of the report rather than the report itself.
Credibility flags: methodology not disclosed. Sample size not disclosed. Publisher type: commercial market-research brand promoting its own paid product.
A relevance score out of 100, built from three things: how well it fits the six practice types, how recent it is, and how solid the methodology behind it is.
It scores decently on practice fit since wellbeing sits right in its subject matter, loses ground on recency because no date is given anywhere, and drops to nothing on how solid the method is, since nobody, including GWI, has put a checkable figure behind the claim.
| Practice type | Relevance | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|
| Coaching | Medium | Use as background reading, not as a quotable stat. |
| Therapy | Low | Skip; therapy marketing needs firmer ground than this. |
| Training | Medium | Fine for general context on fitness trends, not for claims. |
| Alternative Healing | Low | Avoid citing directly; too easy for a client to challenge. |
| Clinical | Low | Not suitable for clinical marketing or compliance-checked copy. |
| Retreat/Centre | Medium | Useful for general tone-setting, not for numbers on the website. |
Best before: worth revisiting if GWI ever publishes a dated, sourced version of this report; until then, treat it as background reading with no shelf life to speak of.
Most practices have reached for a confident, well-branded stat at some point and only later wondered where it actually came from.
You stayed to the end and here we both are. We have a visual river, a story garden and a listening wind that belong to a practice exactly like yours - and a discovery call where they all make beautiful sense over coffee. Biscuit?