Deloitte asked 180 health system executives around the world how they felt about 2026, and most said cautiously chipper, according to its 2025 outlook survey. This includes practices like yours, in the loosest possible sense.
Practices tend to run on considerably smaller budgets than the health systems in this survey, so the confidence being reported here belongs to a different, much larger species of health care organisation.
| Original Research | Deloitte's 2026 outlook survey finds most global health executives feeling cautiously positive, even with cost and staffing worries hanging about. |
|---|---|
| Source | https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/health-care/life-sciences-and-health-care-industry-outlooks/2026-global-health-care-outlook.html |
| Overview | The survey questioned 180 health system executives worldwide about finances, workforce, AI and cybersecurity ahead of 2026, and Deloitte Global published the findings as part of its annual sector outlook. |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publisher | Brand, Deloitte Global |
| Relevance to Wellbeing | Useful as a general barometer of mood in the wider health care sector, but written for hospital and health system leadership, not solo or small wellbeing practices. |
| Our Verdict | Too early to tell It tells you how the big players are feeling without telling you a single thing about how your clients feel. |
| Our Summary |
|
| Our Geo View | Findings reflect large hospital and insurance-based health systems, mostly in the US, and don't map neatly onto NHS-style or single-payer systems elsewhere, so treat this as US-heavy corporate health care context rather than something universally transferable. |
Deloitte asked health system bosses how they felt about 2026 and mostly got a shrug of cautious cheer, tempered by worries about money, staff and cybersecurity.
Deloitte Global, 2026 Global Health Care Outlook, published 2025.
Credibility flags: survey of 180 health system executives worldwide, methodology disclosed by Deloitte, no independent peer review, and the publisher is a professional services firm reporting on its own commissioned research.
A relevance score out of 100, built from three things: how well it fits the six practice types, how recent it is, and how solid the methodology behind it is.
Marked down on how well it fits small wellbeing practices, kept high on recency since the survey is barely a year old, and given a middling score on how solid the method is because it's Deloitte's own research rather than an independently run study.
| Practice type | Relevance | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|
| Coaching | Low | Mention in passing, don't build anything on it. |
| Therapy | Medium | Use as a talking point on burnout content, not as evidence. |
| Training | Medium | Use the AI-anxiety angle as a hook for upskilling offers. |
| Alternative Healing | Low | Skip it, wrong audience entirely. |
| Clinical Practices | Medium | Treat as an early signal of pressures that eventually reach smaller clinics. |
| Retreat/Centre | Low | Not really applicable, park it. |
Best before: revisit when Deloitte publishes its 2027 outlook, or check the Deloitte Global report directly if quoting figures beyond this summary.
Watching a global health giant fret politely about 2026 while you're posting about breathing exercises on a Tuesday does rather highlight the gap between their world and yours.
A good sign. We have an ecosystem, a visual river and a story garden that have been waiting for a practice like yours. Come and find out what we mean - the coffee's hot and the discovery call goes properly both ways.