Visionary Marketing's 2026 research on local search behaviour found that people weighing up a solicitor, a clinic or a financial adviser want 38 to 47 reviews and a 4.4 star rating before they'll so much as consider booking, well above what satisfies them for an average business. This includes practices like yours.
Practices offering anything health-adjacent are being judged by a stricter yardstick than the local café, and a thin review page reads as a warning sign rather than a blank slate.
| Original Research | A 2026 look at local search habits found that "high-consideration" categories, including healthcare, set a noticeably higher bar for review volume and star rating before earning a look-in. |
|---|---|
| Source | https://visionary-marketing.co.uk/blog/local-seo-statistics-2026 |
| Overview | Visionary Marketing combined a consumer panel with a crawl of Google Business Profiles to see what actually moves people from browsing to booking. |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publisher | Brand, Visionary Marketing |
| Relevance to Wellbeing | Directly evidences the credibility threshold for healthcare and other high-trust categories, which is exactly the territory wellbeing practices sit in. |
| Our Verdict | Too early to tell a disclosed consumer panel plus a GBP crawl is a decent basis, even if it's not independently audited. |
| Our Summary |
|
| Our Geo View | Applies broadly to all countries. |
Visionary Marketing's 2026 report on local search behaviour, which put a number on how many reviews and what star rating gets someone to actually consider a business, and found healthcare comes out near the top of the demanding list.
Visionary Marketing, published 2026. Primary-sourced, not paywalled.
Credibility flags: methodology disclosed as a consumer panel combined with a Google Business Profile crawl, sample size not stated, publisher is a commercial marketing agency reporting on its own field.
A relevance score out of 100, built from three things: how well it fits the six practice types, how recent it is, and how solid the methodology behind it is.
Marked down slightly on how solid the method is since the sample size isn't given, but scored well on practice fit and recency, given healthcare is named directly and the data is from this year.
| Practice type | Relevance | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|
| Coaching | Medium | Build up review volume steadily, aim past the 20 mark before treating it as a strength. |
| Therapy | High | Prioritise both review count and star rating, closely tracking the 4.4 benchmark. |
| Training | Medium | Highlight safety and results in reviews to meet the cautious-buyer mindset. |
| Alternative Healing | High | Use detailed reviews to counter scepticism directly, not just star ratings. |
| Clinical | High | Treat the 38-47 review median as a minimum target, not an aspiration. |
| Retreat/Centre | High | Showcase volume and specificity in reviews, given the size of the spend being justified. |
Best before: revisit when Visionary Marketing next runs this study, or sooner if you want to check the numbers against a second, independently conducted source.
Every practice owner has stared at their own thin review page and wondered if it's costing them clients before anyone's even read a word of their bio.
The best practitioners always find their way here. We have a story garden, a listening wind and a visual river waiting to make sense of themselves - they do, beautifully, in a twenty-five-minute conversation over a good coffee. How do you take it?