In 2023, Mailchimp totted up open, click and bounce rates from its own users across dozens of trades and published the lot as a benchmarking table, minus anything resembling wellness. This includes practices like yours, in the sense that you're left borrowing someone else's average and hoping it fits.
Practices sending newsletters into the void with nothing to measure against are, technically, working blind, and Mailchimp's data at least gives them a general shape to aim for, even though it wasn't built with them in mind.
| Original Research | A running tally of Mailchimp's own customer open, click and bounce rates, broken down by trade. |
|---|---|
| Source | https://mailchimp.com/resources/email-marketing-benchmarks/ |
| Overview | Mailchimp aggregates campaign performance from its own platform users and sorts it into broad industry categories, publishing the results as a public benchmarking resource. |
| Year | 2023 |
| Publisher | Brand, Mailchimp |
| Relevance to Wellbeing | There is no wellness, coaching or therapy category, so any practice using this has to squint at the nearest general match and treat it loosely. |
| Our Verdict | Too early to tell it's real data from real sends, but none of it was gathered with your sort of practice in the room. |
| Our Summary |
|
| Our Geo View | Applies broadly to all countries |
Mailchimp collected its own senders' open, click and bounce figures and sorted them by trade, with wellness left off the list entirely.
Mailchimp, resource page, published 2023.
Credibility flags: methodology is aggregated customer send data, not independently audited. Sample size not disclosed. Publisher type is a brand reporting on its own platform.
A relevance score out of 100, built from three things: how well it fits the six practice types, how recent it is, and how solid the methodology behind it is.
It's marked down on practice fit, since wellness never got its own category, and marked down a little on how solid the method is, given nobody outside Mailchimp checked the sums, though it holds up fine on recency for something from 2023.
| Practice type | Relevance | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|
| Coaching | Medium | Use the general average loosely, then track your own trend over time. |
| Therapy | Low | Treat the benchmark as background noise, not a target. |
| Training | Medium | Check click rates on class reminder emails against the nearest matching category. |
| Alternative Healing | Low | Skip comparison entirely, watch your own open rate over months instead. |
| Clinical | Medium | Compare appointment reminder open rates loosely, don't lean on it too hard. |
| Retreat/Centre | Medium | Watch click-through on booking emails, that's the number that pays the bills. |
Best before: whenever Mailchimp next refreshes the page, or sooner if they finally add a wellness category. Check the current figures at Mailchimp before quoting these as current.
There's a particular sinking feeling in sending a newsletter and never once checking whether anyone opened it, and this is as good an excuse as any to start.
Deserves a conversation that matches. The discovery call goes both ways - your wishes and ethics, our ecosystem and listening wind, a story garden built for practices like yours. twenty-five minutes. Good coffee.