Deloitte UK says employers get back roughly £5 for every £1 spent on staff mental health, a line refreshed in November 2025 and still doing the rounds in 2026 coverage. This includes practices like yours, if you employ anyone besides yourself.
Practices quoting this figure to corporate clients or funders should know it is a well-worn number given a fresh coat of paint, not a new finding.
| Original Research | Deloitte's ongoing case that workplace mental health spending pays for itself several times over |
|---|---|
| Source | https://www.deloitte.com/uk/en/services/consulting/research/mental-health-and-employers-refreshing-the-case-for-investment.html |
| Overview | Deloitte UK models the financial payback of employer mental health support using existing evidence, with the November 2025 edition updating a report line the firm has run for years. |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publisher | Industry body, Deloitte UK |
| Relevance to Wellbeing | Wellbeing practices that employ staff, or that sell into corporate wellness budgets, can borrow this stat to make the financial case for mental health support, provided they date it honestly. |
| Our Verdict | Too early to tell the underlying model is credible and widely cited, but the ratio has been recalculated and republished so often that "2026 research" is a stretch. |
| Our Summary |
|
| Our Geo View | Figures are UK-specific, built on UK sickness absence and NHS-adjacent costs, so treat the ratio as illustrative rather than transferable outside the UK. |
Deloitte UK's long-running attempt to put a price on mental health support paying off, refreshed again in late 2025 and still being quoted into 2026.
Deloitte UK, Mental Health and Employers report, November 2025 edition. Coverage citing the figure in 2026 largely repeats the same underlying model rather than presenting new fieldwork.
Credibility flags: economic modelling based on existing evidence rather than a single fresh survey, exact sample and methodology details not fully disclosed in press coverage, publisher is a professional services firm with a commercial interest in the topic.
A relevance score out of 100, built from three things: how well it fits the six practice types, how recent it is, and how solid the methodology behind it is.
Marked up on practice fit for touching mental health and workplace wellbeing directly, marked down on recency since the modelling reaches back years, and marked down on how solid the method is given the figure's habit of shifting between editions.
| Practice type | Relevance | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|
| Coaching | High | Use the figure in corporate coaching pitches, dated correctly. |
| Therapy | High | Cite it when pitching employer-funded therapy schemes. |
| Training | Medium | Use as supporting evidence, not the headline claim. |
| Alternative Healing | Medium | Use sparingly, alongside softer wellbeing outcomes. |
| Clinical | High | Reference in occupational health and EAP proposals. |
| Retreat/Centre | Medium | Use in corporate booking materials, with the date attached. |
Best before: revisit when Deloitte next refreshes the report, and in the meantime check the primary Deloitte UK source before quoting a specific multiplier.
Every practice owner who has ever reached for a big shiny statistic to close a corporate pitch knows the discomfort of not being quite sure where it came from.
The best practitioners always find their way here. We have a story garden, a listening wind and a visual river waiting to make sense of themselves - they do, beautifully, in a twenty-five-minute conversation over a good coffee. How do you take it?