A marketing blog, undated as far as anyone can tell, does the maths and reckons ten hours a week on social media comes to thirteen full working weeks a year; this applies to your practice too, whether or not you fancy doing the sum yourself.
Practices that tot up their own weekly social media hours against this figure may recognise the shape of it, even though nobody signed their name to the calculation.
| Original Research | A blog's own arithmetic, claiming that ten weekly hours spent on social media adds up to thirteen full working weeks lost each year |
|---|---|
| Source | https://blog.picmim.com/blog/how-much-time-companies-spend-social-media |
| Overview | The post multiplies a weekly hours estimate by fifty two weeks to argue that time on social platforms is time away from other business tasks, and it appears on a marketing agency's own blog. |
| Year | Not stated on the source page |
| Publisher | Brand, Picmim (marketing agency blog) |
| Relevance to Wellbeing | The underlying logic, that hours spent posting are hours not spent with a client, transfers neatly to any owner run wellbeing practice, though the number itself was worked out rather than researched. |
| Our Verdict | Too early to tell The multiplication is sound, but there is no survey, no sample and no source behind it, just one blog's tidy sums presented as if they were findings. |
| Our Summary |
|
| Our Geo View | Applies broadly to all countries |
A marketing agency's blog post working out, in its own words, how many hours a year get eaten by social media upkeep.
Picmim blog, publish date not shown anywhere on the page. No named author or study is attached, so this is being treated as a self published, secondary claim rather than a sourced statistic.
Credibility flags: no stated methodology, sample size not disclosed, publisher type is a marketing agency blog rather than a research body.
A relevance score out of 100, built from three things: how well it fits the six practice types, how recent it is, and how solid the methodology behind it is.
Marked down hard on how solid the method is, since there isn't one on show, scored decently for how well it fits a small owner led practice, and marked low on recency simply because there was no date to check it against.
| Practice type | Relevance | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|
| Coaching | Medium | Cap weekly content hours and protect session time first. |
| Therapy | Medium | Track hours spent on socials against client hours for one month. |
| Training | Medium | Batch content creation to one sitting rather than daily scrolling. |
| Alternative Healing | Low | Lean on referrals and reviews before adding more posting hours. |
| Clinical | Low | Delegate social tasks rather than doing them between appointments. |
| Retreat/Centre | High | Assign a fixed weekly hour budget to whoever runs the socials. |
Best before: revisit this once a properly sourced time-use study turns up, and check the original claim against Picmim's blog for any update or citation added later.
Most practice owners already know the feeling of watching a week disappear into a content calendar that never quite finishes itself.
A good sign. Curious practitioners tend to love the discovery call - where our visual river, story garden and listening wind make beautiful sense, and your ambitions get the attention they're owed. Coffee while we talk. Oat milk?