A 2026 industry write-up claims three in ten patients avoid treatment purely because they don't know what it'll cost, and over half would come sooner if the price were on the table upfront. This includes practices like yours, if you charge money for anything at all.
Practices that keep pricing vague are, according to this claim, quietly losing patients who'd rather stay uncomfortable than risk an unexpected invoice.
| Original Research | A piece on healthcare marketing leadership arguing that being upfront about cost could be a selling point rather than a liability |
|---|---|
| Source | https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2026-07-15-gartner-survey-shows-healthcare-cmos-can-lead-on-cost-transparency-for-a-competitive-advantage |
| Overview | The piece argues healthcare marketing leaders could win trust by publishing prices, though the headline figures themselves aren't tied to any named survey or sample. |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publisher | Industry body, Gartner |
| Relevance to Wellbeing | Cost anxiety is a familiar barrier in private healthcare and wellness settings alike, so the underlying idea, if not the exact numbers, tracks with what clinics and centres already suspect about hesitant patients. |
| Our Verdict | Too early to tell the sentiment is plausible and useful, but the 30% and 55% figures have no visible survey, sample, or source behind them, so treat them as a talking point, not a statistic. |
| Our Summary |
|
| Our Geo View | Assumes a pay-per-treatment healthcare model typical of the US; less directly relevant where treatment is NHS-funded, though UK private clinics, therapists, and aesthetic practices still apply. |
A Gartner newsroom piece encouraging healthcare marketing leaders to treat honest pricing as an advantage rather than a risk.
Gartner newsroom, dated 15 July 2026. The specific 30%/55% figures are not attributed to any named survey, report, or dataset on the page itself.
Credibility flags: no methodology disclosed, sample size not disclosed, publisher type is an industry analyst firm rather than a research body for this particular claim.
A relevance score out of 100, built from three things: how well it fits the six practice types, how recent it is, and how solid the methodology behind it is.
Marked down heavily on how solid the method is, since the headline figures carry no visible sourcing, while practice fit and recency score reasonably well because the topic and timing are current and applicable.
| Practice type | Relevance | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|
| Coaching | Medium | Clarify package pricing upfront on your site and in intro calls |
| Therapy | High | List session fees plainly rather than "enquire for pricing" |
| Training | Medium | Show full cost of a course or pass including any extras |
| Alternative Healing | Medium | Publish a simple price list to reduce first-visit hesitation |
| Clinical Practices | High | Give clear, itemised pricing before treatment is booked |
| Retreats/Centres | High | Break the headline price into what it actually covers |
Best before: revisit if Gartner or another named body publishes an actual sourced version of these figures; until then, treat this as a prompt to check your own pricing transparency, care of Sunlight Creations.
Every practice owner has, at some point, dodged saying the price out loud and lost the client to their own imagination instead.
A good sign. Curious practitioners tend to love the discovery call - where our visual river, story garden and listening wind make beautiful sense, and your ambitions get the attention they're owed. Coffee while we talk. Oat milk?