HMDG's 2026 barometer of UK private MSK clinics found most owners are keen enough on AI, they're just stuck on where to actually begin, which is a very different problem to solve. This includes practices like yours, if yours happens to be a clinic.
Clinic owners are not the AI holdouts everyone assumed, they are mostly just waiting for someone to point at the right button.
| Original Research | A large benchmarking survey of UK private MSK clinics found willingness to try AI far outweighs outright resistance, with confusion the real sticking point. |
|---|---|
| Source | https://hmdg.co.uk/private-practice-barometer/ |
| Overview | The barometer covers pay, pricing, retention and marketing across UK MSK clinics, and HMDG, a specialist benchmarking outfit for the sector, publishes it annually. |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publisher | Industry body, HMDG |
| Relevance to Wellbeing | Directly relevant to Clinical Practices, since the sample is entirely private clinic owners, and only loosely relevant to coaching, therapy, training, healing or retreat settings that weren't surveyed. |
| Our Verdict | Too early to tell a big, sector-specific sample makes this one worth actually using in your marketing, not just nodding at. |
| Our Summary |
|
| Our Geo View | Survey specific to UK private clinics; attitudes and regulatory context for AI tools may differ elsewhere. |
HMDG asked 715 UK private MSK clinic owners about pay, pricing, retention and, tucked in among it, their actual feelings on AI.
HMDG, "UK Private Practice Barometer 2026", published 2026, full primary source.
Credibility flags: self-reported survey, sample size disclosed at 715, publisher is an industry benchmarking body rather than an academic or government one.
A relevance score out of 100, built from three things: how well it fits the six practice types, how recent it is, and how solid the methodology behind it is.
Marked up for a strong practice fit given the sample is clinics only, full marks on recency, and marked down slightly on how solid the method is, since it's an industry survey rather than an independently audited one.
| Practice type | Relevance | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|
| Coaching | Low | Note the trend, don't quote the stat as your own. |
| Therapy | Medium | Borrow the "confusion not cost" framing for your own AI messaging. |
| Training | Low | Use it as background context only. |
| Alternative Healing | Low | Skip quoting figures, keep the general point about openness. |
| Clinical | High | Use the 60% and 14% figures directly in marketing copy. |
| Retreat/Centre | Low | Reference the theme, not the numbers. |
Best before: this is an annual barometer, so check HMDG's next edition in 2027 before quoting these figures again.
If you've been putting off AI in your clinic because you weren't sure it worked, this survey suggests most of your peers weren't sure where to click first either.
Deserves a conversation that matches. The discovery call goes both ways - your wishes and ethics, our ecosystem and listening wind, a story garden built for practices like yours. twenty-five minutes. Good coffee.