A McKinsey line that's been doing the rounds since 2023 claims 84 per cent of US consumers rate wellness a top or important priority, with younger people feeling the biggest gaps in mental health. This includes practices like yours, assuming the number holds up, which is not entirely clear.
Practices tempted to lean on this figure to justify a mental health offer are leaning on a stat McKinsey never quite finished explaining.
| Original Research | A frequently repeated claim that most US consumers now treat wellness as essential, with Gen Z reporting the sharpest unmet needs in mental, cognitive, heart, and gut health. |
|---|---|
| Source | https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/future-of-wellness-trends |
| Overview | A McKinsey insights page touching on consumer wellness priorities, though no underlying report, survey name, or methodology is named on it. |
| Year | 2023 |
| Publisher | Brand, McKinsey & Company |
| Relevance to Wellbeing | Directionally interesting for therapy and mental-health-adjacent practices, but there's no named survey, sample, or method behind the headline number, so it belongs in the "industry talking point" pile rather than the "cite with confidence" one. |
| Our Verdict | Too early to tell the headline figure has no visible source, sample size, or methodology attached to it anywhere, just McKinsey saying so. |
| Our Summary |
|
| Our Geo View | The claim is drawn from US consumers only; treat any UK or wider relevance as assumed, not confirmed. |
A McKinsey page suggesting most US consumers now rank wellness alongside family as a life priority, with Gen Z feeling the shortfall hardest in mental, cognitive, heart, and gut health.
McKinsey & Company, published on their own site, exact date unclear. The page failed to load properly when Sunlight tried to verify it, and no separate report or survey document is linked from it.
Credibility flags: methodology not disclosed, sample size not disclosed, publisher type Brand (self-published insights, not an independently commissioned study).
A relevance score out of 100, built from three things: how well it fits the six practice types, how recent it is, and how solid the methodology behind it is.
Marked down hard on how solid the method is, since there isn't one to point to, held roughly steady on how relevant the topic is to wellbeing practices, and nudged down slightly on recency given the stat has been circulating since 2023.
| Practice type | Relevance | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|
| Coaching | Medium | Use the general sentiment, skip the specific number. |
| Therapy | Medium | Pair the mental health gap idea with a properly sourced stat before using it publicly. |
| Training | Low | Mention only as background colour, not as evidence. |
| Alternative Healing | Low | Fine for tone, not for a claims-heavy page. |
| Clinical Practices | Low | Avoid citing this one anywhere near a regulator. |
| Retreats/Centres | Medium | Use the Gen Z angle in marketing copy, without the percentage attached. |
Best before: revisit this one only if McKinsey ever publishes the underlying survey with a named methodology; until then, treat it as permanently provisional.
Most practices have felt that gap between "everyone says wellness matters" and "nobody can prove it with a number worth repeating."
Deserves a conversation that matches. The discovery call goes both ways - your wishes and ethics, our ecosystem and listening wind, a story garden built for practices like yours. twenty-five minutes. Good coffee.